EVEREST is a decision-support methodology designed to improve the success rate of consumer and B2B digital product development. The Everest process, Sherpa team and Bootcamps provide a "Decision as a Service" for companies looking for an alternative to expensive consulting and agency engagments.
We call our process 'Everest' because of the similarities between developing new digital products and climbing the world’s tallest mountain. Climbing Mt. Everest requires meticulous planning, technical acumen, mastery of specialized tools, domain experience and most importantly, good decision making in complex environments. The failure rate of both endevors is high.
~94% of consumer digital products fail. ~87% never launch.
~65% of people that attempt Mt. Everest succeed. 34% fail.
Product development is not like climbing Mt. Everest It’s actually harder. Why? Everest’ climbers have an advantage you don’t... 99% are guided by Sherpas.
Three simple rules that prevent bad decision making:
The Everest methodology is based on a proprietary database made up of 1000+ projects (Consumer/B2B/B2E) across all types of digital channels. Ten data points that define a product including budget, effort, duration to first launch, # of change orders, discreet product launches, team type (onshore/offshore/mixed) and the big one…Lifespan. Some findings include,,,
Despite there being no clear path to repeatable success, failure is often prediclable.
The EVERST▲DaaS™ methodology, created by Bradley Hill and put into practice by TruNorthern, originated from a desire to improve the dismal success rate of digital product development.
From the author…
“I wish I could say Everest stemmed from some positive, warm, new-agey place or a rediscovered ancient wisdom, but it doesn't. It comes from seeing the impact of bad decisions (from clients, consultants and agencies) over 27 years. Preventable bad decisions that fall into two categories: The wrong person or wrong time (too early or too late). So, I decided to find ways to improve the odds of success.
I looked to science, statisics, business, pyschology, government, military, self-help gurus, game theory and even spiritual disciplines to find a path to success for complex digital projects. The result of all that research? There is no single path to ensure success. But you can prevent bad decisions. That is where Everest started. With the revelation that avoiding bad decisions and making good ones are two very different things. ”
Quality is both objective and subjective. Objective quality can be measured through budget efficiency, on-time delivery, estimation accuracy and number of defects.
Subjectively, quality can take the form of a delighted user and great reviews, an award winning design or a spike in downloads and purchases.
Both matter. Quality is the most important metric at TruNorthern.
TruNorthern is unique among digital service companies. We believe transparency builds trust so we share estimates, rates, costs, hours, everything with our clients. If the budget, timeframe or solution is unrealistic, we will tell you. If there is a company better suited for your product, we will introduce you to them.
Being fully transparent allows us to focus on your product not accounting.
Innovation is required in a stable, successful digital company. Innovation requires focused effort and calculated risk. Risk leads to success and failure. Both are great teachers and agents of change.
"Understanding how and why something failed is as important to the practice of innovation as success."
Buckminster Fuller, American architect, systems theorist, author, designer, inventor and futurist.
We are selective with the clients and projects we take on. We look for clients with real digital challenges we can solve and alignment of ideals and goals. Every successful project we deliver and every dollar you spend with us helps maintain a stable environment for growth. Growth leads to change. Change leads to innovation.
"We don't want projects. We want clients for life."
Brad Hill, Founding Partner, TruNorthern
WHY TRUNORTHERN? WHY NOW?
While it's true in today’s digital landscape, coding is a commodity, development platforms and frameworks are mature and Cloud is cheap, selecting a development team is still a difficult decision to make.
Do you look for companies with specific capabilities in the platforms and tools you use? Do you look for people with overall technical delivery experience? Is cost still a factor in decision making? Does it really matter where these developers are located and what time zone they are in?
YES. YES. YES. YES.
1. The Offshore Development model has collapsed under the weight of global demand. Rates have gone up and quality has dropped. Offshoring made financial sense 10 years ago. Today it is a risk.
2. The Agency / Consulting model is old, broken and too expensive. It is built on the premise that everyone is an expert. These companies are typically good at one thing, average at most, poor at others. Those average to poor resources are billing on your projects.
3. The most experienced digital veterans are independent. Preferring to choose the projects that they want to work on.